Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Kuzey Cekirge vs Tim Van Der Horst Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Cekirge vs Horst analysis and find out who is favored!
Kuzey Cekirge vs Tim Van Der Horst Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Cekirge 1 - 0 Horst
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cekirge has won 47.39% of points on their second serve, while Horst has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cekirge, in recent form, has won 50.1% of their opponent's second serve points, while Horst has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.93% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cekirge has saved 49.68% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Horst has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cekirge has won 67.61% of matches played (W/L 48/ 23), with Horst winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cekirge has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 133/ 83), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 63/ 47). Horst has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 49% (W/L 17/ 18), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Cekirge has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 67.61% of matches (W/L 48/ 23), where as Horst has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Cekirge winning 1 times and Horst being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Cekirge winning 2 and Horst winning 0. The last match between Cekirge and Horst was at the M15 Targu Mures, 18-09-2019, First, Clay with Kuzey Cekirge getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:20:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Cekirge and Horst have played a deciding set 0 times, with Cekirge winning 0 times and Horst 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Cekirge winning 0, and Horst 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cekirge has played against opponents with an average rank of 110.72 while Horst has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cekirge has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Horst has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cekirge has converted 46.67% of breakpoint opportunities, and Horst has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
28
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
60% (196-130)
Career Total W/L
46% (61-72)
73% (32-12)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Kuzey Cekirge | Tim Van Der Horst |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:20:0 | 1:20:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (38/65) | 54% (26/48) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 61% (23/38) | 42% (11/26) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 48% (13/27) | 32% (7/22) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (6/9) | 29% (2/7) |
| Return Points W% | 63% (30/48) | 45% (29/65) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Kuzey Cekirge
Player
Tim Van Der Horst
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
9
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Kuzey Cekirge | Tim Van Der Horst |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 73% (32/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 66% (69/35) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (562/458) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 71% (10/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 73% (22/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.06 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 30 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.11 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 53 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 98.2 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (964/1481) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (593/964) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (245/517) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (77/165) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (636/1439) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 73% (32/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 72% (31/43) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (10/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (25/23) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (25/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 47% (19/9) | 0% (0/0) |
Kuzey Cekirge Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Laurent Lokoli
Player
Kuzey Cekirge
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kuzey Cekirge
Player
Harry Wendelken
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kuzey Cekirge
Player
Benoit Torcq
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
72%
(
36 of
50)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
46%
(
19 of
41)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
53%
(
31 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
52
Total Points Won
56
|
0-6 6-2 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Mert Naci Turker
Player
Kuzey Cekirge
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kuzey Cekirge
Player
Paul Woerner
66%
(
63 of
96)
1st Serve %
81%
(
73 of
90)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
52%
(
33 of
63)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
50%
(
48 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
53 of
90)
101
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 7-5 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Kuzey Cekirge
38%
(
23 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
47 of
72)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kuzey Cekirge
Player
Daniil Ostapenkov
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
46%
(
28 of
61)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kuzey Cekirge
Player
Vit Kalina
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
69%
(
45 of
65)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
62
Total Points Won
56
|
4-6 6-2 11-9 | H2H | ||
view more
Tim Van Der Horst Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Piotr Grynkowski
Player
Tim Van Der Horst
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
78%
(
38 of
49)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
55
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 3-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Christian Samuelsson
Player
Tim Van Der Horst
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
13
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
11 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Niklas Schell
Player
Tim Van Der Horst
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tim Van Der Horst
Player
Ingo Herzgerodt
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
57%
(
48 of
84)
7
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
84)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dominik Boehler
Player
Tim Van Der Horst
50%
(
23 of
46)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
96%
(
22 of
23)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Van Der Horst
Player
Romain Gales
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kuzey Cekirge
Player
Tim Van Der Horst
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
9
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Cekirge Vs Horst Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
